Russ Decker’s fumbling attempts to get his priorities straight

decker111407.jpgI read with some interest Russ Decker’s (D-Schofield) recent interview with The Daily Page for their “Comp Time With…” series. Decker recently took over for Judy Robson upon her deposal from the top spot amongst Senate Democrats as Majority Leader.

His first action once in the position? Pushing through the so-called Video Competition Bill, a contentious piece of legislation that proponents claim will bring Wisconsin consumer’s greater cable competition and better rates, and that opponents say will destroy consumer protections, cut funding for public access and hurt access for people in more rural parts of the state.

So it was with particular interest that I read the following point-blank statement made by Decker in the interview. When asked "Why has the video franchise bill become a priority?" his response was simple: "The video franchise bill is not a priority for me."

Wait, what? Hadn’t I just been reading, in multiple sources, about Decker’s desire to make said bill his "first priority" once in as the Majority Leader? Or was my memory failing me?

I started to dig around. Sure enough, according to an opinion piece in The Capital Times written by John Nichols, Decker said "that one of his first priorities will be to promote passage of a plan to take the power to regulate cable companies away from Wisconsin communities."

Now granted, that little tidbit comes from an opinion piece, but one would hope that Nichols, as a journalist, had done his due diligence in getting the quote. The same sentiment, it should be noted, was mentioned in several other publications as well.

Still, the plot thickens.

There are a few other choice statements made by Decker in the interview. He claims that he tried to stall the bill as it moved through committee, and that "The only thing I had to do with it was when it was sent to the Finance Committee, and I didn't look at it all during the budget process. As I said earlier, when the budget was done, I took my first look at it."

You sure about that, Russ? That statement alone contradicts itself, first claiming that his first look at the bill was when it was referred to the Joint Finance Committee back in April, but then he goes on to say he took his "first look" at it once the budget was done (in October).

Have we managed to land ourselves a Majority Leader who can’t keep his own facts straight, lies in interviews and may or may not have, at one time, been in cahoots with disgraced former Senator Chuck Chvala? Oh yeah, and since we’re on a roll here, let’s not forget about Decker’s drunk driving arrest two years ago, which adds a nice twist (of lime) to his recent support of a last-minute provision added to the budget that legalized the serving of liquor samples in grocery stores. Decker himself commented that "I’m looking forward to going to the Pick N’Save back home" after that passed.

Knock yourself out there, Russ.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Shenangians

Mr. Decker, I call shenanigans.

reality

Russ Decker never said it was a priority. John Nichols never interviewed him on the topic and has no quote to from Decker saying it is a priority. Go ahead and ask him. Decker was asked if we would schedule the bill everyone took that to mean it was a priority. This bill has been out there for months and the only reason people had some to build support for amendments to make it better is because Decker insisted it go to the Joint Finance Committee. Sen. Robson and others wanted the bill passed in the spring and there are direct quotes for that.

He also didn't put in the liquor provision. Some folks upset about the change in leadership are spreading rumors that just aren't true.

And as a woman I'm a little disappointed that other women would count a woman working in Decker's office as being in "cahoots." Have a little more respect for your own gender than letting people talk you into believing that a professional woman still gets her orders from her husband on what to do.

Re: reality

sallyjones wrote:
Russ Decker never said it was a priority. John Nichols never interviewed him on the topic and has no quote to from Decker saying it is a priority. Go ahead and ask him.

Actually, we did ask John Nichols about it. We will have his retort later today.

Response from John Nichols

The response from John Nichols can be found by clicking here.

About that reality....

Did Russ Decker ever say “This bill is a priority for me”? I don’t know.

What I do know, because the public record shows, is that within hours of Decker being sworn in as the new Senate Majority Leader, he brought the bill out of committee and onto the Senate floor. If that doesn’t make something a priority, I don’t know what would.

Refusing to pass it out of committee and on to the Senate while they were embroiled in the extremely long process of attempting to pass a budget would have been akin to political suicide for Decker, or anyone else who might have tried it. The people of Wisconsin were getting ready to demand politician’s heads on stakes if they didn’t get a budget passed. How do you think it would have looked if one of them had decided to focus on something entirely unrelated?

Decker said it himself: "I made a commitment to Sen. Plale that when the budget was on the governor's desk, I would move the bill out of committee and that's exactly what we did."

Again, that sounds a whole lot like a priority to me. I’m just asking for some accountability here, a little bit of honesty, which I think is the very least we should be asking of our publicly elected officials.

As to the comment calling my "respect for my own gender" into question, I’m not going to dignify the charge with an answer, because it’s so irrelevant and so off-base as to render it completely spurious, not to mention ridiculous.

----
thelostalbatross.blogspot.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dd><a> <b> <dl> <dt> <i> <u> <ul><br><p> <div> <u> <object> <strike> <img> <embed> <param>
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.