Navigation

 

Become a Member!

Center for Media and Democracy drops ALEC document bomb

Post by Jesse Russell on 7/13/2011 1:50pm

Center for Media and Democracy drops ALEC document bomb

On March 15, 30 days after the first mass rally occurred at the Wisconsin State Capitol building, University of Wisconsin Professor William Cronon published an article on his new blog titled, “Who’s Really Behind Recent Republican Legislation in Wisconsin and Elsewhere? (Hint: It Didn’t Start Here).” The comprehensive piece looked at the recent history of conservative legislation and the fact that much of it, state-by-state, all seemed to be similar. That led him to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC): “Its goal for the past forty years has been to draft 'model bills' that conservative legislators can introduce in the 50 states. Its website claims that in each legislative cycle, its members introduce 1000 pieces of legislation based on its work, and claims that roughly 18% of these bills are enacted into law. (Among them was the controversial 2010 anti-immigrant law in Arizona.)”

This wasn’t Madison’s first introduction to ALEC. In 2004 I wrote for a short-lived bi-weekly publication called The Wisconsinite where Katya Szabados wrote an extensive cover story on the organization (unfortunately, the website for the paper has long been abandoned, but the first part of the story can still be read at FightingBob.com). Szabados made many of the same discoveries as Cronon, with the primary difference being the legislation being pushed in 2004 was “school choice” in Milwaukee.

Cronon published his piece while all eyes were on Wisconsin and the New York Times asked him to write an editorial. It’s possible the editorial would have simply made the rounds through various listservs and progressive blogs. Within a day or two any attention would have died down, but Cronon found a very unlikely ally in the Republican Party of Wisconsin’s Stephen Thompson. After his initial entry was posted and before the editorial appeared in the Times Thompson made a Freedom of Information Act request for all of Cronon’s emails that referenced:

”Republican, Scott Walker, recall, collective bargaining, AFSCME, WEAC, rally, union, Alberta Darling, Randy Hopper, Dan Kapanke, Rob Cowles, Scott Fitzgerald, Sheila Harsdorf, Luther Olsen, Glenn Grothman, Mary Lazich, Jeff Fitzgerald, Marty Beil, or Mary Bell.”

Thanks to this request and the debate surrounding the privacy rights of public university faculty, the ALEC story gained additional traction and went first national and finally international.

Thompson’s blunder unintentionally resulted in people asking, “If the Wisconsin GOP is so paranoid that they’ve issued an FOIA request for this information does that mean there something to the ALEC allegations?”

Thanks to The Wisconsinite I’ve known about ALEC since 2004, but I was suddenly seeing ALEC signs at the rallies carried by individuals who had previously been unlikely to wade into the political muck. It had a similar impact to the infamous Walker/Koch call.

The investigations into ALEC have not stopped. Today, Madison’s very own Center for Media and Democracy launched ALEC Exposed, a project that serves as a major document drop of more than 800 “model” bills written by ALEC that previously hadn’t been available to the general public.

CMD writes: “We have analyzed and marked up the bills and resolutions to help readers understand what the bills do, beyond the PR in the names of bills. We share them to help the public identify the legislation in their state and the wide extent of the agenda to rewrite our rights by the corporations that bankroll ALEC.”

While CMD has begun the process of connecting the dots they’re asking for help from the public. This link explains how to utilize the ALEC Exposed wiki.

CMD Executive Director Lisa Graves has published a letter explaining why the organization decided to launch ALEC Watch.

Jesse Russell

Co-Editor

Jesse Russell

Jesse was born and raised in Connecticut, began blogging in 1997, and moved to Madison in 2003. In 2005, he co-founded dane101 along with Kristian Knutson and Shane Wealti. In addition to helping nearly a dozen contributors run this website he's helped launch various events in the city including What's Your Damage?!, the MadPubQuiz of Awesomeness, the Fire Ball Masquerade, Dane101's Freakin' Halloweekend, and more.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I keep reading this over and over but I still don't understand what the allegation is here? That model legislation exists? That legislatures use it? That's not a recent development. Why single out ALEC?

You assume there is an allegation. Just information. But aren't you a little twisted that here is not only proof that legislation is getting written not by legislators or even lobbyists, but a think tank? If all their ideas come from a prewritten hymnal, who needs the legislators? And do ideas that fit in New York, after cutting and pasting, work for us here?

Model legislation has existed since the late 1800s. It does not make me twisted.

The problem is, to quote Center for Media and Democracy's Executive Director, Lisa Graves, "It is a worrisome marriage of corporations and politicians, which seems to normalize a kind of corruption of the legislative process -- of the democratic process--in a nation of free people where the government is supposed to be of, by, and for the people, not the corporations."

"The full sweep of the bills and their implications for America’s future, the corporate voting, and the extent of the corporate subsidy of ALEC's legislation laundering all raise substantial questions. These questions should concern all Americans. They go to the heart of the health of our democracy and the direction of our country. When politicians -- no matter their party -- put corporate profits above the real needs of the people who elected them, something has gone very awry."

You can't give model legislation from the ACLU a pass while at the same time freaking out about model legislation from ALEC. People are going to disagree about the best way to run this country. That's good. That's supposed to happen.

Don't like ALEC? Then vote for candidates who reject its agenda. Simple as that. But whoever you vote for is going to support some model legislation from some source at some time during his or her legislative career. It's just part of the system. Has been for hundreds of years. So don't attack the mechanism itself, because you're people are using it too, whether you're aware of it or not.

Ninja,
An example of the ACLU's model legislation being enacted into law would be appropriate here. One? Anyone? Beuler?

The bias motivated sentence enhancments (hate crime laws) that swept state legislatures in the late 90s were almost all the product of ACLU or ADL model legislation.

Okay, fair enough. One example, over a decade ago. ALEC differs in it's focused, continual attempt to influence legislation on a braod array of issues, year in and year out, and in its wealth, which translates into ability to have disproportionate impact. Wealthy corporate conservatives are writing legislation to favor wealthy corporations, and using donations to pump up support among Republican state legislators. THe result is that corporate interests are controlling state legislation to a degree far beyond what the ACLU could dream of -- or should be able to dream of.

ALEC distributed, and Republicans have introduced, legislation to make it more difficult to vote in over 36 states. This includes stringent ID and/or document requirements, ending same-day registration, rolling back the availability of early voting and vote-by-mail, and other moves. Early voting in itself is a hugely popular feature that's been used by millions of Americans, especially working people who can't always take the time to wait in long lines on election day itself. According to the Brennan Center for Justice (at NYU School of law), over 5 million eligible voters will find it significantly more difficult to vote in 2012. Those affected will be primarily students, senior citizens, low income citizens, and the handicapped.

By coincidence (ha!) students, senior citizens, and low income citizens are more likely to vote Democratic.

Rembmeber that it often takes only a couple of percentage points to tip an election one way or the other.

Republicans claim that they support these new laws in order to prevent voter fraud, a crusade started by Rove during the Bush years. But ALL OBJECTIVE STUDIES show that voter fraud is a very rare, isolated occurance which doesn't change electoral outcomes.

In fact, ALEC has coordinated a well-planned effort to suppress the turnout of Democratic voters in 2012, with the goal of aiding a Republican win. THey don't plan to win by convincing the voters they're right, but by keeping the voters away from the polls.

JR: I have been reading about ALEC in Madison newspapers since at least 1990, starting with its anti global-warming propaganda and going forward through controversy after controversy, including legislators' expenses payment, school voucher "research," and even its studies showing public employees being way overpaid! Nothing ALEC promotes should have surprised anyone, but it did. The Wisconsinite was good stuff, by the way.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dd><a> <b> <dl> <dt> <i> <u> <ul><br><p> <div> <u> <object> <strike> <img> <embed> <param>
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.